What bills did Gov. Reeves veto in the 2025 session?

Published 9:00 am Monday, May 5, 2025

During the 2025 legislative session, Gov. Tate Reeves vetoed eight bills sent to his desk. 

During the next regular session, legislators can override the vetoes if a two-thirds majority in each chamber votes to do so. Overrides are rare, and only one of Reeves’ vetoes has had this happen. It was a public education funding bill in 2020, overridden by a vast majority vote of the House and Senate. That was the first veto override since 2002.

Bills vetoed this session

Subscribe to our free email newsletter

Get the latest news sent to your inbox

• House Bill 569 — The law would have changed when medical facilities were required to apply for a “certificate of need” from the Mississippi State Department of Health before opening or adding new services. Reeves vetoed the bill because he argued it unlawfully attempted to circumvent an ongoing court case by granting a certificate to a single psychiatric hospital in Jackson.

• House Bill 924 — The legislation would have granted the Legislature’s watchdog committee the authority to conduct a review of new state agency regulations and determine if those regulations conform to what the Legislature intended for the agency to do. Reeves vetoed the bill because he argued that it greatly expanded the power of a legislative committee and may have exceeded the constitutional authority of the legislative branch. 

• House Bill 1085 — This bill would have removed a grant program for Main Street projects in the state from under the Mississippi Development Authority, an executive agency directly under Reeves’ control, to the Mississippi Department of Archives and History, an agency governed by an independent board. Reeves argued that the legislation was unconstitutional because it combined general legislation with an appropriation bill, which the Mississippi Constitution prohibits. The governor compared the legislation to a “duck-billed platypus that defies both logic and classification.” 

• House Bill 1126 — The bill would have set a maximum local match requirement for counties and municipalities that receive Gulf Coast Restoration funds to fund projects. Currently, the Mississippi Development Authority sets rules and regulations for a local match. The legislation capped the local match at either 20% of the total cost or the value of one mill of taxable property in the area, whichever is less, but Reeves vetoed the measure because it mandated requirements instead of allowing an agency to set flexible rules. 

• Senate Bill 2386 and Senate Bill 2867 — These two bills made technical amendments to the state’s Medicaid program, often referred to as the “Medicaid tech bill.” The main thrust of the two bills was to lock in place supplemental payment programs that have been a lifeline for hospitals. Reeves said in his veto message of Senate Bill 2867 that locking the supplemental payment program in place is in contradiction with another of the bill’s mandates, which would change the program to allow out-of-state hospitals that border Mississippi to participate in the supplemental payment program. “Complying with both requirements is a legal impossibility and places the Division, like Odysseus, between Scylla and Charybdis,” Reeves wrote. Reeves vetoed Senate Bill 2867 while the Legislature was still in session. Instead of overriding the veto, the Legislature passed Senate Bill 2386, a new Medicaid technology bill that addresses only some of Reeves’ concerns. The governor also vetoed that bill. 

• Senate Bill 2573 — This bill would have created the Mississippi Department of Tourism, but Reeves vetoed the bill because legislative leaders failed to pass a budget during their regular session. The governor argued it would be irresponsible to create a new state agency without an accompanying budget. 

• Senate Bill 2840 — This bill would have allocated money for various projects around the state. Reeves argued the bill was unconstitutional because it combined general legislation with an appropriations bill, something the Mississippi Constitution prohibits. 

Mississippi Today contributed to this article.